Monday, February 8, 2016

Starter 2.8:  Belief Quiz  Did the quiz tell you what you already knew?  Did it surprise you at all?


Literature Circle Meeting #1
Lit Circle Groups
Lit Circle Guidelines
Lit Circle Meeting Protocol


Jessica Prompts for Meeting #1

  1. Why do you think Chris (Alex) is yearning so strongly for this Alaskan adventure?
  2. How is Into the Wild an “intertextual” work?  How does its intertextuality aid us in interpreting the meaning?


EXPLORE THE INTERTEXTUAL CONNECTIONS
Read:  Excerpts from Walden by Henry David Thoreau

JOURNAL 2.8:  Response to Walden
1.  Describe Thoreau's philosophical position on human beings and their relationship with nature/wildness.  How does he contrast it with man's "civilized" state?  Use quotes from reading to explain your answer.
2.  What connections do you see with Chris McCandless?  Identify at least one quote from Thoreau that you believe Chris would have embraced and explain your connection.
3.  What is your personal reaction? Do you agree with Thoreau that "the so-called comforts of life" are "positive hindrances to the elevation of mankind"?  Can we be our authentic selves while enjoying our detailed lives full of modern conveniences?  Or  must we connect to our own wildness and natural state?

Friday, February 5, 2016

Meditation Station: Welcome, Penny Stahl!!!


JOURNAL 2.5:  Reflect on meditiation experience today.  How did it go for you?  


Into the Wild Lit Circle Guidelines


TO DO LIST
1. Finish JOURNAL 2.4:  Thoughts on Trancendentalism
2. JOURNAL 2.5:  Reflect on your experience meditating
3. Reading Time, Into the Wild

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Starter 2.4:  
a. What do you think of the idea of Transcendental Meditation?
b. What is Kurt Vonnegut's take on it?  Make an interpretive claim.

Meet Maharishi:)
Discuss claims and the evidence you see in the text to support them.


Lesson:  Transcendentalism
In partners, identify the philosophical tenets in these Transcendentalist thoughts



JOURNAL 2.4 Thoughts on Transcendentalism:  How does transcendentalism speak to you personally?  Which pieces resonate and which do you reject?  Why?



Into the Wild!
Sign out Into the Wild
Literature Circle guidelines:  1st meeting Monday
Start reading!


Honors:  Keep reading Cat's Cradle as well!  Meeting next Thursday to discuss themes and clarify plot.






Wednesday, February 3, 2016

Starter 2.3:  Synthesize the content of yesterday's film.  What did you find striking, interesting, disturbing, questionable?  What do you think about the bigger question the film is asking?


Announcements
Into the Wild for tomorrow!
Anyone want to publish rhetorical piece in the Quill?



TED TALK EXPLORATION:  Are You There God? Playlist
Explore 2-3 different talks (depending on length)
IN COMP BOOKS, for each talk: 
1.  Briefly summarize the main points of the talk.
2.  REACT What stood out to you about this talk?  Did you agree or disagree?  Why?
(A-ha; Say What?; I wonder...)

SHARE OUT:  Speed dating
If you watched the same talk, discuss how you felt about it.
If you watched different ones, summarize and share take-aways.



What is the difference between religion and spirituality?  
Come up with 1-2 phrases, words, sentences, quotes that you associate with each word:  RELIGION, SPIRITUALITY
Chalk talk.


Read Vonnegut, "Yes, We Have no Nirvanas" for tomorrow
(Homework if you don't finish in class)


Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Starter 2.2 Thoughts on Religion and Science  
Philosophize:   Are religion and science compatible?  Can they work together to illuminate meaning in our lives?  Or do they contradict each other?


In groups, make a T-chart.
Commonalities between Religion and Science
Areas where you see tension between them
SHARE OUT.


Stephen Jay Gould's "NOMA" Non-overlapping Magisteria
Read Gould's original article (linked) for more depth of information!

Non-overlapping magisteria (NOMA) is the view advocated by Stephen Jay Gould that science and religion each represent different areas of inquiry, fact vs. values, so there is a difference between the "nets" [1] over which they have "a legitimate magisterium, or domain of teaching authority," and the two domains do not overlap.[2] He suggests, with examples, that "NOMA enjoys strong and fully explicit support, even from the primary cultural stereotypes of hard-line traditionalism" and that it is "a sound position of general consensus, established by long struggle among people of goodwill in both magisteria."[1] Still, there continues to be disagreement over where the boundaries between the two magisteria should be.[3]

Quote from Gould:  "Our failure to discern a universal good does not record any lack of insight or ingenuity, but merely demonstrates that nature contains no moral messages framed in human terms. Morality is a subject for philosophers, theologians, students of the humanities, indeed for all thinking people. The answers will not be read passively from nature; they do not, and cannot, arise from the data of science. The factual state of the world does not teach us how we, with our powers for good and evil, should alter or preserve it in the most ethical manner"


READ: The Meaning of Life in a Formula
ADD SOME THOUGHTS TO YOUR STARTER.  REFER TO SPECIFICS IN THE ARTICLE.  AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH AUTHOR?



Historical Context of the Religion/Science Struggle:  BBC Documentary:  The End of God?  A Horizon Guide to Science and Religion

  • Take notes on the film.  Note major events in the historical ideological struggle between religion and science.  Jot down questions.  Think about where are now in this struggle as a species and where you are as an individual


Monday, February 1, 2016

Starter 2.1:  What are your initial thoughts on the first Question of the Week?



Questions for the Week
  • How do religion and other forms of spirituality give meaning and purpose to human life?
  • How does science?
  • Are religion and science compatible or at odds?

"The Creation" by Eduardo Galeano
1. Illustrate the passage.
2. Make an interpretive claim about the passage
3.  Discuss:  What questions is Galeano answering?  How does this passage relate to the questions of the week?


Watch Rick Warren's TED Talk"A Life of Purpose"

  • How does his faith give him purpose?
  • Are his arguments convincing?
  • Even if you are not religious, what can we learn from his example?


Synthesize "The Meaning of Life" reading.  If you have not read it yet, please do so and answer the following questions in your comp book.  If you have read it, just answer the questions.
1. What are the two points of view the author presents about how we can deal with the question of the meaning of life?  Which do you agree with more?
2. What criteria generally seem to lead to a happy life?
3.  How/Why does religion help people answer the questions of our existence?
4.  What new ideas does this reading give you about the meaning of life?

IN YOUR COMP BOOK:  Add more to your starter after the thinking you did today.  What role does religion play in human life?



OPTIONAL HOMEWORK




Honors Book Club:  Sign out Cat's Cradle!

Friday, January 29, 2016

Starter 1.29:  Journal for 10 minutes in response to the following poem.  Or write a poem back.  Or just react.  In light of everything we have been studying lately, where does this poem hit you?


Mary Oliver, The Summer Day
  Who made the world?
  Who made the swan, and the black bear?
  Who made the grasshopper?
  This grasshopper, I mean--
  the one who has flung herself out of the grass,
  the one who is eating sugar out of my hand,
  who is moving her jaws back and forth instead of up and down--
  who is gazing around with her enormous and complicated eyes.
  Now she lifts her pale forearms and thoroughly washes her face.
  Now she snaps her wings open, and floats away.
  I don't know exactly what a prayer is.
  I do know how to pay attention, how to fall down
  into the grass, how to kneel down in the grass,
  how to be idle and blessed, how to stroll through the fields,
  which is what I have been doing all day.
  Tell me, what else should I have done?
  Doesn't everything die at last, and too soon?
  Tell me, what is it you plan to do
  with your one wild and precious life?

Announcements



Mini-workshop on making interpretive claims about literature
1.  Make an interpretive claim about the Mary Oliver poem.  Write it on the whiteboard.

2.  What makes for a good claim about  literature/film/art, etc?

  • It states your conclusions/interpretations about the work. Whatever the claim, you must be able to support it with evidence.
  • It doesn’t just state the obvious; it expresses an interpretation that reasonable people could disagree with.
  • It is specific and focused without being so narrow that there is insufficient evidence.
  • It generally expresses one main idea.  If compound ideas are stated in a thesis, the relationship between them is very clear.
  • Try to use sophisticated phrasings beyond "This poem is about...."
And, as ever, good claims ....
  • debatable
  • are specific and focused
  • avoid stating the obvious
  • are clearly and eloquently stated
  • avoid the first person (AVOID “I think, I believe, My opinion is, etc.”)
  • can be supported with sufficient evidence


3.  Examples
  • “Slip of the Tongue” by Adriel Luis examines how minority women have been oppressed by society’s unrealistic expectations of feminine beauty. 
  • In The Outsiders, Cherry Valance represents the obligation felt by some members of the upper class to help those less economically fortunate than themselves.
  • In “When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer,” Walt Whitman uses structure and imagery to contrast the scientist’s perception of the night sky with his own poetic perception.
  • In Guernica, Picasso shows us the horrors and senselessness of the collateral damage brought about by indiscriminate bombing as a tactical strategy.
  • Montana 1948 is an allegory for America’s pursuit of its "manifest destiny"; it describes the way in which the Indian minority was exploited and abused in the process of America’s westward expansion (-Tucker Leavitt)

4. Revise your claims about "The Summer Day" on the whiteboards and share out.

5.  Revise your claims about Harold and Maude in your seminar synthesis.  Highlight what you consider to be the claim before you turn it in.


HONORS SEMINAR:  The Stranger
For your reflection this time, do THE EXACT SAME format as the Harold and Maude seminar.  One part self-assess and one part synthesis rooted in an interpretive claim.

WORK TIME DURING HONORS SEMINAR
1.  Seminar Reflection and Synthesis (due today!)
Seminar Rubric
2.  Read and annotate "The Meaning of Life" (due Monday!)

Honors:
A CHANGE OF PLANS! Sign out copy of Cat's Cradle!  We are going to do this for our next round of Book Club.

Honors Independent Study crew:  See me!

TURN IN SEMINAR PREP AND REFLECTION/SYNTHESIS TODAY!

HOMEWORK:  

  • Finish reading and annotating "The Meaning of Life" if you did not do so in class.
  • Honors:  Reflection/Synthesis on The Stranger
  • Prepare for Exhibition