Goals for the Day
- Compare and contrast the rhetoric of conflicting ideologies
- Continue to explore perspectives on foreign policy
Starter 10.26:
What was interesting, surprising, or disturbing about the experience of reading Bin Laden's letter?
Pair share: What do you already know (or think) about the politics and military conflicts in the Middle East? About Israel/Palestine? About US foreign policy and/or military involvement?
Crash Course: Israel and Palestine Explained
Another possible project medium: Spoken Word Poetry
Rafeef Ziadah: We teach life, sir.
Response Protocol: ("Rhetoric is a response and invites a response.")
1. Get out a piece of paper.
2. Listen to the poem.
3. MOMENT OF SILENCE. On your paper: #response. Respond with a sentence, a verse, or a hashtagged phrase.
4. Pass the paper. (Keep up that silence. Breathe deep.)
5. Respond. (Silently.)
6. Repeat. (Breathe. Reflect. Shhh.)
Discuss:
How does this video expand your understanding of what is happening in Israel and Palestine?
Why is Rafeef' Ziadah's perspective important?
Group Work: Rhetorical Analysis of Osama bin Laden's open letter to America.
- What are the similarities and differences between Osama bin Laden's and George Bush's rhetoric?
Discuss
- Whose rhetoric is more effective? Why?
- How does our own ideology influence each rhetorical transaction?
Exit ticket (2 sided):
1. How does today's work help you understand the concept of ideology and the idea that "rhetoric transmits ideology"?
2. What questions do you have? (Write down at least one question; it can be about rhetoric, US foreign policy, the ideological conflicts in Middle Eastern foreign affairs, or anything else you may be wondering about at this point.)
Homework
Read/annotate "Doublespeak" by William Lutz. Be able to identify the thesis of the article and define the key terms. (euphemism, jargon, gobbledygook, inflated language)