Monday, October 6, 2014

THE BIG QUESTIONS
1. Are “civil disobedience” and "non-violent direct action" sound methods for promoting social change?  In what ways are these methodologies effective?  What are the flaws?  Is there a better way?
2. Can individual citizens change the government?  Why or why not?  If so, how?  If not, is democracy possible?


Goal for the Day:
Understand Thoreau's argument for resistance to civil government


Starter 10.6
Is Civil Disobedience an effective way for the people in a democracy to change their government/society?


Meanwhile, in Jefferson County....
Some highlights from public participation at the JeffCo School Board meeting:  http://www.jeffcopublicschools.org/board/20141002JPSBoardMtgStreampt1of5.mp4
15:30
25:30


SLC Prep and Schedule


Civil Disobedience Jigsaw Seminar Coaching

Groups/Sections
1.  Part 1, ¶ 1-2
Lacey
Vivi
Alicia
Hayden

2.  Part 1, ¶ 3-5
Will
Lia
Sonya
Duncan

3.  Part 1, ¶ 6-7
Lyle
Noah
Lawson
Sam S

4.  Part 1, ¶ 8-9
Ellen
Max
Chris
Nicholas

5.  Part 2, ¶ 1-3
Sam D
Josh
Charles
Bryce

6.  Part 2, ¶ 4-5
Devin
Becca
Cameron
Rowan

7.  Part 2 ¶ 6,8/Part 3 ¶1
Ellie
Daniel
Bekah


1.  Summarize your assigned section.   Write a bulleted list of main points (paraphrased).
2.  Analyze Thoreau’s use of rhetoric using the concepts we have studied.  Find 3 examples of language that demonstrate the characteristics of rhetorical discourse.  (Look for appeals, arguments, fallacies, doublespeak, etc.)
3.  Choose 2 quotes from your assigned section that you feel are important to his argument and explain their significance.
4.  Add your findings from 1-3 to the Google Doc.
5.  Present your analysis to your classmates.


HOMEWORK:  
As individuals, add 2-3 comments to the Google Doc in the margins.  You should “annotate” Thoreau’s ideas and quotes.  
FOR WEDNESDAY:  Read and annotate Martin Luther King Jr's "Letter From a Birmingham Jail" for the seminar.