Thursday, September 30, 2021

Thursday, September 30th

Coleman OR Za: present mini-project!

Starter: Please take this survey from senior Jazzy Lindsay.


Continue working on the Rhetorical Discourse Case Study!

What is Critical Race Theory and Why is it Under Attack?

  • Who can summarize the article you read yesterday? 
  • What did we learn from it? 
  • How does it answer its own questions in the headline?
  • What questions do we have?

In the news:

  1. Indigenous history, culture cut from South Dakota standards (AP News: Aug 10, 2021)

  2. History should be taught, not forgotten (Indian Country Today: Aug 13, 2021)

Let's do some sourcing (ethos!) work together.


WORK TIME

(PM pod Honors check-in)


Wednesday, September 29, 2021

Wednesday, September 29th

 POD 2: James and Za (YAY!)


Together:

Why Americans are so divided over teaching critical race theory (PBS Newshour June 24, 2021)

What is Critical Race Theory and Why is it Under Attack? (Education Week, May 18, 2021)


Answer the following questions:

  1. To the best of your ability, explain “critical race theory” and the controversy surrounding the perception that it is being taught in schools.


  1. What questions do you have at this point?


Continuing…

Rhetorical Case Study:  How should US History be taught in schools?

Political Cartoons

Reading Assignments (hard copies?)

What must you do?


HONORS Check-in

Topic Brainstorm

Historical Thinking Skills

Clarify assignment

The next book

Film ideas...


Tuesday, September 28, 2021

Tuesday, September 28th

 CIRCLE UP!


Rhetorical Discourse Mini-Project Share-Out

  1. What did you do for your project? What was the message? Show us!

  2. Which appeals did your project contain?

  3. What is something that you have learned about effective rhetoric from playing around with discourse?

Deadline extended until midnight tonight to finish up project and reflection questions!




Rhetorical Case Study: How should US History be taught in schools?

  • Please make a copy of this document to use for the rest of the week!
  • Seminar next Monday on the texts and the topics
  • TODAY: launch inquiry; react to news/prewrite; What is critical race theory and what is the controversy?


This week, we will begin to examine the rhetoric on both sides of a divisive and controversial issue: the question of how US History should be taught in schools and the controversy surrounding “Critical Race Theory” and related ideas. We will be consuming media for the next few days and culminating in a seminar on Friday on the topic.


KEY QUESTIONS:

  • What is critical race theory?

  • Is it being taught in schools?

  • Should it be?

  • What are the motives and values on both sides of this issue?

  • How should America’s history be taught to young people? 

  • To what degree should we be taking a critical lens to issues of racism and systemic oppression (in the past and the present)?

  • How is rhetoric shaping this issue?


IN OUR LOCAL NEWS!

Montezuma-Cortez School Board passes resolution opposing critical race theory (The Journal, September 23, 2021)


1. CRT Controversy Pre-write (One solid paragraph):  Before beginning to research the rhetoric of the case, where do you think you find yourself on this issue?  What do you think about the School Board decision in Montezuma-Cortez? Where do you think your opinions and values on this topic come from?  What experiences or exposure to rhetoric have formed your opinions?




2. WHAT IS HAPPENING? What is the Controversy?

Donald Trump announces Patriotic Education Commission (September 2020)

Why Americans are so divided over teaching critical race theory (PBS Newshour June 24, 2021)

What is Critical Race Theory and Why is it Under Attack? (Education Week, May 18, 2021)


Answer the following questions:

  1. To the best of your ability, explain “critical race theory” and the controversy surrounding the perception that it is being taught in schools.

  1. What questions do you have at this point?



HONORS: I will post this week's Honors work by the end of the day today. We will also have a brief check-in tomorrow to discuss a few things simmering on our collective Honors burner:)

Thursday, September 23, 2021

Thursday, September 23rd

 MINI-PROJECT Mini-tune

  1. Groups of 3-4

  2. Share out your draft or verbally process your idea to your peers. Explain the rhetorical situation (THINK: triangle). Share which of the Aristotelian appeals your project seeks to focus on.

  3. Peers ask questions and give feedback or suggestions to the projecteer. Essentially, have an organic, supportive conversation around the project that helps move each other forward.


WORK TIME/CONFERENCES


Honors meeting: NHD exploratory meeting


Wednesday, September 22, 2021

Wednesday, September 22nd

Dear students:

Unfortunately I had to keep my poor child home again today, so I thank you in advance for your understanding and for being your best selves for Melissa.

I am hopeful that you all were able to get through the to-do list yesterday and are transitioning to using your work time for the RHETORICAL DISCOURSE MINI-PROJECT. As you are brainstorming topics, try to find a message that you are excited to express! Think about different media and genres of expression that might suit your message. You are not limited to the suggested ones on the project doc! Think about what you have learned so far about rhetoric, and try to apply it to the task!


Here is a folder of sample projects that last year’s class did for this same assignment. 


Some answers to the EXCELLENT questions in your exit tickets from yesterday:

  1. What types of topics do you want us to go for? Is it okay to do something more minor or limited to our school community?

Topic choice is pretty wide open! It does not necessarily need to be politically minded or related to global issues. It can DEFINITELY be about our school community or something “minor.” It can even be interpersonal! A love letter convincing someone to date you? SURE! A letter to the editor of the Animas Quill arguing for longer lunches or passing periods? OF COURSE! The idiotic vandals that keep leaving trash by the ruined hammock? YOU TELL ‘EM, ZA! ;)

  1. How are we going to consider the audience and how do we know when we are? What steps are we going to take to make sure we do that?

This depends on the message and who the target audience is. Who are you trying to convince and of what? If you are writing a love letter, consider what might appeal to your potential love interest. If you are making a campaign poster for StuCO, consider what the AHS voters might value and care about. When we craft rhetorical messages, we must always consider what the audience might value/think/believe/etc. Taylor your message to YOUR audience.

  1. Are you open to students doing projects that aren’t on the list such as a painting or poem?

YES! Art and poetry are often rhetorical in nature. Think about what you may need to incorporate into your creative work that will give it more rhetorical appeal. How does one CONVINCE through art?

  1. Is there a required word count?  How much writing is necessary? 

This completely depends on the genre you choose. As I said in the assignment description, some text should be included, but that might be minimal if you are doing a piece of visual rhetoric. Because you have to write the self-evaluation/reflection, you will be able to explain yourself pretty thoroughly there.

  1. What are we supposed to base our mini-projects on? Like on a person or an idea

It depends on what you want to express. On a message that is rhetorical in nature! So an idea, yes! A person, maybe? If you want to express a message ABOUT a person, ie. “Vote for Pedro,” then yes.

  1. How many points is the project worth? 

It is worth 25 points toward your application grade (which is weighted heavier than your process grade). The rubric is located at the bottom of the assignment description.

  1. What kind of social media are we using for that genre? 

Whichever one carries your message the most effectively. Perhaps you make a Tiktok or a series of rhetorical Snapchat stories. One kid last year turned in a Facebook argument he had with a stranger about politics. RHETORIC! 

  1. Are we going into more detail when you are back?

That was certainly my hope for today, but alas! I hope to help you all clarify your own projects tomorrow. If my daughter continues sick, I will use my best pathos on my husband to get him to take a day off so I can be there with you guys tomorrow.

  1. Do I need some sort of artist statement?

Not necessarily, but it may allow you to clarify and enhance your message, thus making it more effective.

  1. What resources do we need to include and how long should it be?

I assume you are referring to citing sources here? That is again dependent on genre. Not all genres require citing sources, but some benefit from that. Remember: it’s an ethos based appeal to cite experts and credible sources!

  1. Can we use a show or movie for a reference?  

SURE! You can even make a short movie if you like:)

  1. Can we do it with partners?

I hadn’t thought about that. If you have a great idea for a partner project, email me and sell me the idea! 

  1. Can i put anything?

Well, not anything. But it is pretty open in terms of messages. Email me if you are questioning your idea.

  1. What are the parameters for what we can make to represent our rhetoric? 

There is a list of possible media in the project description, but you aren’t limited to those choices. Determine the genre that is best for your own message. Have some fun with it!

  1. How much time do we have to complete this project?

You have today and tomorrow in class to work on it, and it will be due September 28th after your 3-day weekend.

  1. When do we start?

RIGHT NOW! Ready, set, go!


Come tomorrow with a “draft” of what you are working on, whatever that looks like for you, even if it is just a thoroughly brainstormed idea!


Please complete the exit ticket in Google Classroom at the end of the hour.


Tuesday, September 21, 2021

Tuesday, September 21st

Dearest juniors:

My daughter had to stay home sick today, so life has bought you guys another work day. Please be productive and complete the tasks below. Be kind to Melissa and ask her how her day is going! Even in my absence, I expect you to bring your intellectual selves to class and take advantage of your time! I hope to be back with you guys tomorrow to discuss the role of rhetoric in a democratic society and help you develop your mini-projects!



WORK TIME TASKS

  1. Finish up the AUDIT from yesterday. Make sure any paper assignments make it into the box and electronic assignments get submitted in Classroom or emailed to me TODAY. If you add any missing entries to your Digital Comp Book, please email me that you have done so, and include a link to the doc.
  2. ASSESS: If you did not complete it yesterday, finish the Self-Assessment: Daily Classwork and Intellectual Presence and the Rhetoric and Ideology Process Reflection/Check for Understanding. There are a few paper copies in the classroom. It can also be found in Google Classroom electronically.
  3. What is the role of rhetoric in a (democratic) society? Finish the rest of the Herrick reading (“An Overview of Rhetoric”), page 17-26 START at the header “RHETORIC AS AN ART” on page 17. Complete the Notes/Examples as you read. Paper copies on front table; electronic copy in Google Classroom.
  4. Preview and begin to brainstorm the RHETORICAL DISCOURSE MINI-PROJECT. There will be a draft of this due on Thursday for a critique protocol, so do your best to try to develop an idea today, so that tomorrow’s work time will be productive for you.
  5. HONORS: Scavenger Hunt: National History Day website
  6. EVERYONE: Complete the Exit Ticket in Google Classroom by the end of the hour.

Monday, September 20, 2021

Monday, September 20th

ASSIGNMENT AND ASSESSMENT AUDIT

We are going to use the following tools to assess where we are thus far with daily classwork, intellectual presence, and big concept learning.


GRADING CONFERENCES WITH JESSICA?



READ the rest of the Herrick reading for tomorrow! Complete the Notes/Examples as you read.



Honors: This Week

Meeting on Thursday, second half of class

Scavenger Hunt: National History Day website


Friday, September 17, 2021

Friday, September 17th

Starter:  The Pathos of Poetry: Rafeef Ziadah: “We teach life, sir.”

How does this poem impact you? How does poetry function as rhetoric? Are artistic perspectives important to consider when we formulate our perspectives about political issues?  Why or why not?  What are perspectives we should consider when we formulate our views on foreign policy?


FOUR CORNERS

  • America has a special role to play in the world to help spread democracy and keep the peace.


 9.17: FOREIGN POLICY IDEOLOGY

What are some conflicting biases on foreign policy?


FIRST! Ethos Check!

What gives these authors authority to speak on this topic? Who are they?



 9.17: FOREIGN POLICY IDEOLOGY

Foreign Policy Bias (THINK: What is each saying about the American military’s role in the world?)

Quote from reading that captures main argument

Commit for the Long Run



A Briefing on the History of Military Interventions



REFLECT:  Where do you find yourself on the issue of foreign policy?  Do you tend to agree more with the ideology of President Bush and the authors of “Commit for the Long Run”?  Or do you seem more swayed by Dr. Grossman’s claims?  Are you somewhere in the middle?







HONORS ASSIGNMENT: OPTIONAL FOR ALL!

All are invited to view this film, Honors or not! If you are curious about the rhetoric of US leadership in the 18 months following 9-11, this film may interest you.

Leading to War:  Examining the Rhetoric of the Bush administration leading up to the Iraq War


What was the response?

Bombs over Baghdad:  How is “Shock and Awe” rhetorical?

Largest Mass Peace Protest in Human History


Thursday, September 16, 2021

Thursday, September 16th

Starter (Verbal share): What was disturbing, surprising, or interesting about reading Bin Laden's letter?


IN GROUPS (of 3-4):  Rhetorical Analysis of Osama bin Laden's open letter to America.


Whole Class:  T-chart

  • What are the similarities and differences between Osama bin Laden's and George Bush's rhetoric?

 Discuss

  • How does each use Aristotelian appeals?  (Arguments? Pathos? Ethos is relative to audience?)

  • Whose rhetoric is more effective?  Why?

  • How does our own ideology influence each rhetorical transaction?



CONTINUE FOUR CORNERS

  • The United States military is the best in the world.

  • It is unpatriotic to oppose a war.

  • When a foreign people is being governed by a tyrannical leader, the United States should intervene to overthrow that leader.

  • Citizens should have a say in whether or not their country goes to war.

  • The benefits of a just war are worth the costs.

  • America has a special role to play in the world to help spread democracy and keep the peace.


"The Bush Doctrine"

In his book "Decision Points" (Crown Publishers, 2010), President Bush articulates his discrete concept of the Bush Doctrine. According to the President, his doctrine consisted of four "prongs," three of them practical, and one idealistic. They are the following: (In his words)

1.    "Make no distinction between terrorists and the nations that harbor them--and hold both to account."

2.    "Take the fight to the enemy overseas before they can attack us again here at home."

3.    "Confront threats before they fully materialize."

4.    "Advance liberty and hope as an alternative to the enemy's ideology of repression and fear."


Key Points:

Unilateralism
With us or with the terrorists

Discuss:

What are the advantages of this viewpoint?  What good points does the Bush doctrine have?

What drawbacks are there to this strategy?


Israel/Palestine Conflict Background Info (Thanks, Mr. Green!)




OPTION TO READ AHEAD!

If you would like to take copies of tomorrow's readings to start tonight, you are welcome to do so. I am giving you time in class tomorrow, but if you want to get a jump, yay! (Ahem...looking at you Honors...)