Starter 9.6:
Storycorps episode from August 18, 2017: Francine Anderson
- Would you classify this story as “rhetorical discourse”? Why or why not?
- If you don’t think it qualifies as rhetoric, explain what sets it apart using Herrick’s stated characteristics of rhetorical discourse (see your reverse outline or yesterday’s ppt for reference).
- If you do think it qualifies, explain how Francine Anderson (and the Storycorps format in general) uses the resources of language (the 4A’s: argument, appeals, arrangement, aesthetics) to modify/influence the perspective of the audience.
WORK TIME on group analysis of Dr. King’s speech
If your group finishes early, use the extra time to keep reading Herrick and completing your reverse outline notes.
Discuss Rhetorical Analysis of Dr. King’s speech
Another Civil Rights perspective....
Malcolm X: By Any Means Necessary
- How is Malcolm X’s message both similar and different from MLK’s?
- What exigency do they have in common?
- How are their appeals different? What might this have to do with audience?
- Which rhetorical strategy do you think has been more effective at bringing about change? Why?
JOURNAL 9.6 MLK Jr. /MALCOLM X
- How do both MLK’s and Malcolm X's rhetoric impact you personally as an "audience member," an American (or a non-American, Akos), a student of rhetoric?
- Reflect on the ideological progress we have or haven’t made as Americans since the exigency of the Civil Rights Movement.
IF WORK TIME REMAINS:
Finish Herrick and Reverse Outline for Tomorrow
Be sure to come up with original examples in the section “Rhetoric as an Art.” (There is space for this in the outline.)